Max. HR = 220 - your age
For example: A 34 year old's maximum heart rate is: 220 - 34 = 186 bpm
If that 34 year old wants to work out in the cardio zone (70-85% max. hr), meaning her body uses glycogen as the majority percentage of fuel, she would use the following formulas:
- The low end of the cardio zone means that the heart is beating at 70% of it's max.
- (220 - your age) x 0.7 = low end of cardio zone
- The high end of the cardio zone means that the heart is beating at 85% of it's max.
- (220 - your age) x 0.85 = high end of cardio zone
- Low end: 186 bpm x 0.7 = 130.2 bpm
- High end: 186 bpm x 0.85 = 158.1 bpm
If our 34 year old want to work out in the fat-burning zone (55-70% max. hr), meaning her body uses fat as the majority percentage of fuel, she would use the following formulas:
- The low end of the fat burning zone means that her heart is beating at 55% of it's max.
- (220 - her age) x 0.55 = low end of fat burning zone
- The high end of the fat burning zone means that her heart is beating at 70% of it's max.
- (220 - her age) x 0.70 = high end of fat burning zone
- Low end: 186 bpm x 0.55 = 102.3 bpm
- High end: 186 bpm x 0.7 = 130.2 bpm
You might have noticed that the upper end of the fat burning zone and the lower end of the cardio zone are the exact same number. Maximum heart rate and exercise zones are estimates. They outline a general range that identifies what our bodies do during different intensities of work. When our 34 year old exercises and keeps her heart rate at the upper end of fat burning and lower end of cardio, her body uses nearly equal amounts fat and glycogen as fuel.
Source: Fitness: The Complete Guide. Fredrick C. Hatfield, Ph.D. International Sports Science Association, Carpinteria, CA. 2010
Edited by Natalie at 4:08 PM
7 comments:
220 - your age is a reasonable starting point, but it's just a general average. People who are not fit, have health problems or have other risk factors may have a max HR less than this formula indicates. Conversely fit individuals have higher max rates. For instance, I am a 52YO active male; my tested and verified max rate is 178, resting rate is 42.
This is a great post showing the math, but unfortunately the newest research is that the "fat burning zone" is a myth. Not trying to be rude or argumentative, but the "newest theory" is that high intensity interval training is the best way to burn fat...at least this is what I've been reading. Maybe a post on the benefits of high intensity? I myself am redefining my own workouts to include less traditional cardio and more interval training to boost my fat loss.
There are lots of articles out there, here is one though that gives some good info...
http://www.active.com/triathlon/Articles/The-Myth-of-the-Fat-burning-Zone.htm
Again, I'm not trying to be argumentative, just trying to put a thought out there....
One other thing, this is a good guide to give you a general idea of where you should be while training, I just think the "fat burning zone" is confusing to the average person who is just getting into exercising...
Thank you for this detailed post! This just confirms results that have ACTUALLY happened for me by following your advice! It's nice to shed this weight!
my resting heart rate is 45, which makes it challenging to increase it to the fat and cardio zones (I am 52 and active female) How do I account for that?
Hi Julia! Great question. The above formula is, as I said, a general formula. A more accurate range can be found using the Karvonen Formula, which takes your resting heart rate into account. Someone with a low resting heart rate has more room to increase their heart rate than someone with a higher resting heart rate. You can go here to find your range based on your age and resting HR.
http://www.briancalkins.com/HeartRate.htm
Post a Comment